Is Lakoff's analysis of the language and moral assumptions of liberals Essay

Is Lakoffs analysis of the language and moral assumptions of braggart(a)s and conservatives correct , based on what you see in this - Essay ExampleBoaz argues that the nation whitethorn be liberal towards giving a portion of their income but would not give the government total control of the money to use as it sees fit. Therefore, it is even out to support Lakoffs analysis of the language of liberals and conservatives on issues and ideology. Moral Politics by Lakoff goes out to show the language the politicians use in their different sides of fancy towards the public. In this book, Lakoff analyses the unconscious and rhetorical observations of liberals and the conservatives. He asserts that there is a radical but a consistent difference between the liberals and the conservatives origins of morality. His briny agenda is to formulate a model that not only clarifies why the liberals and conservatives engage the positions they do but to also join the collections of liberal and conser vative political stands in public eyes. He argues that the nation is a family and liberals present a different model of the family view compared to the conservatives. The liberals present a nurturing parent (NP) while the conservatives take the assumption of a strict father model (SF). Together encompass decent principals nevertheless they differ in the most important priorities making them drastically conflicting. With these morals, Lakoff agues out his models to decipher the moral construction inside the language of politics and strategy. In the article One Bad and Eight Good Reasons to Cut Taxes Boaz uses the patterns Lakoff analyses in his metaphorical models giving the opposite priorities in terms of tax cart track at the time of Bush government. The individuals backing lofty taxes were opposed the marriage offer to cut taxes based on the less difference it can shew on the economy. This made them hold on the high taxes the government is conducting. In Boazs arguments, he ass erts that the people who earn money possess it and giving the government the sole control is not wise. This is a liberal acclamation in that the family members can make a decision on the family function as opposed to the strict father who will impose strict revises in the family set up. Through the proposition of cutting taxes Lakoffs analysis of an NP model giving the members a better angle to present their views. Lakoff affirms that people appreciate the fact that they are pct of what is going on rather thinking of solutions themselves. This is a result of the fact that the society does not know what it really believes and desires to be informed of the thoughts. Boaz article is a good example of a suggestion that the government could consider. During the Bush administration, there was the strict father model and that encompasses the decisions he made without consultation like the trespass of Iraq. This provides the hypothesis that the father is the sole decision maker consequen tly punishing the children who wrong. Programs given to the public get scrutiny and views as things that citizens get without earning them. This makes the public move that the government is liable for their needs making them immoral. Bush administration suggests the cut in taxes to have the people have more money in order to reduce social programs but this does not necessarily mean the stoppage of military activities. Consequently, the public is hooked to Bush ideals since they associate with the strict father model. The liberal counter to this assumption is that the