Health care laws and how it affects working nurses Research Paper

Social insurance laws and how it influences functioning medical caretakers - Research Paper Example Three kinds of laws oversee the Public Health Law as recently examined: Legislation, Regulations and Judicial Law. The administrative assemblages of state, bureaucratic and neighborhood government, detail the Legislative laws that considerably affect the manner in which nursing is polished in the United States. Guidelines are explicit arrangement of rules relating to individual while the enactment and Judicial law depends on the court’s and jury’s’ choice (Stanhope and Lancaster 124). Stanhope and Lancaster delineate the effect of Regulations and the Judicial Law on nursing practice by expressing that the state officials will order laws administering the leading group of nursing and will coin specialized terms, for example, ‘licensed enrolled nurse’ and ‘nursing practice’, the leading group of nursing then again will uphold the laws that will bring into reality an authorized enlisted nurture and perceived nursing practice methodology by expressing all the necessities and essential (124). The journalists express that in the event of legal law, courts mull over past cases and give sentences in similarity with them aside from during the occurrences when the appointed authority or the jury feels that the old laws have become out of date and an increasingly legitimate type of it is required. Everything that is done in a wellbeing office has a premise in law and is dependent upon lawful authorization of some kind (qtd. in Maurer and Smith 124). This announcement infers to social insurance laborers and all the more especially network arranged breast fed since they have direct, eye to eye relationship with the patients. Rules and guideline likewise with those related with the change of the wellbeing business; dominatingly laws that relate to the upkeep of order in the wellbeing division and allocating discipline identified with negligence are relevant to medical caretakers generally. Medical caretakers are respected, as ed ucated people with sound information on the calling that they practice for their living, shoppers are absolutely dependent on this specific information for their treatment. On the off chance that any patient is hurt in any capacity due to the nurses’ misbehavior that as indicated by a source Hall and Hall (2001) refered to in Maurer and Smith (124), incorporates: Provision of risky condition, insufficient evaluation, inability to follow physician’s request, wrong drug and treatment, use of damaged innovation and items, deficient contamination control and poor correspondence with the patient, the attendant would be considered responsible for her activities and claims can be documented against her. Attendants ought to be very much aware of the laws and enactment relating to their lawful act of the state they are expertly working in, and ought to be well comfortable likewise with any progressions that may be presented in the enactment of nursing as well as in related call ings, for example, those of medication and drug store (Lancaster and Stanhope 125). These essayist exhibit the significance of interdisciplinary information for the nursing calling by expressing the case of a network situated attendant who has audited the drug store act would have the option to learn whether to scrutinize the option to administer medicine in the neighborhood family arranging facility or not. As per The Nurse Practice Act of New York, 1970 nursing is characterized as: The act of the calling of nursing†¦. is characterized as diagnosing and getting human reactions genuine or potential medical issues through such administrations

Meaning of Political Theory

Which means of Political Theory Political hypothesis is a region of the investigation of legislative issues. It is a challenged articulation in that political scholars have neglected to arrive at an agreement on a widely inclusive definition as any such definition will undoubtedly estrange somebody. Scholars have attempted to carry some precision to the challenged ideas with the goal that one can give persuading contentions to the specific social game plans pointed. In any case, John Plamenatz characterized political hypothesis as the precise contemplating the motivations behind government (Farrelly, 2004). The articulation Political Theory is made out of two words, ‘Politics’ and ‘Theory’. Governmental issues actually implies the investigation of legislative issues and it is about irreconcilable situation and its goals which happens at each degree of the general public. Hypothesis is anything from an arrangement to a bit of unique information. In scholastic talk, be that as it may, a hypo thesis is an informative recommendation, a thought or set of thoughts that somehow or another looks to force request or significance upon wonders (Heywood, 2004). This paper along these lines looks to talk about what political hypothesis is. The job of political hypothesis is to examine the political ideas, comprehend and reprimand them using the four devices: ideas, models, speculations and standards. Idea is a general thought regarding something typically communicated in a solitary word or short expression that draws out importance from an in any case interminably complex reality, for instance; correspondence, administration, ideological group, power, social class, rights, law, and so forth. (Heywood, 2004). It assists with comprehending the world by filling in as a device for suspecting, condemning, contending, clarifying and investigating political turns of events and to characterize questions by perceiving that they have comparative structures or properties, subsequently ideas fill in as building squares of human information. Model is a portrayal of observational information that intends to propel understanding by featuring critical connections and associations among factors, for instance; frameworks investigation, open decision, game hypothesis, and so forth. Models are worked around various ideas to apropos look like the first article without essentially turning into its duplicate. A Theory is a clarification and forecast of connections among explicit factors, for instance; pluralism, elitism, functionalism, and so forth. It is generally utilized conversely with model and might be clarified by a progression of models. A hypothesis endeavors to introduce a full clarification and expectation of future occasions while a model endeavors to precisely reflect reality. Worldview is a scholarly system involving interrelated qualities, speculations and suppositions, inside which look for information is directed. It comprises of a lot of rules that structure the procedure of scholarly request, for instance; radicalism, Marxism, woman's rights, and so on. As per Heywood (2004), political hypothesis was comprehensively characterized to incorporate regularizing hypothesis and deliberate hypothesis. Regularizing hypothesis contains the historical backdrop of political thoughts and the nonstop age of new thoughts regarding what society should be. It is worried about moral or regularizing questions, for example, for what reason should I comply with the state, by what means should rewards be disseminated and what ought to be the constraints of individual freedom. This customary methodology is basically keen on looking at how masterminds created and defended their perspectives, and the scholarly setting wherein they worked. Efficient hypothesis incorporates the clarification and comprehension of the current society and empowers one to make projections for the conceivable future changes. Given this distinction in the meaning of political hypothesis, it is difficult to arrive at a trade off on the definition. Political hypothesis includes inve stigative investigation of thoughts and principles that have been key to political idea dissimilar to Political Philosophy which is worried about the basic assessment of political convictions, focusing on both inductive and deductive types of thinking and to explain and refine the ideas utilized in political talk. It has endeavored to see better the conduct of on-screen characters like voters, government officials, lobbyists and civil servants, and has produced discerning decision, open decision and social decision ways of thinking (Heywood, 2004). Hoffman and Graham, in their book, Introduction to Political Theory, clarify that political hypothesis assesses movement that centers around the states that are framed by ideological groups through races to oversee a nation. In regular day to day existence, we are guided by ideas of good and bad, equity and shamefulness, so all that we do is educated by ideas, much the same as lawmakers. People as a rule can't work without thoughts as it is a characterizing property of human movement that we can possibly act when we have thoughts in our mind regarding what we ought to do (Hoffman et al., 2009). The target of political hypothesis is additionally to prepare residents to ponder political inquiries and survey accurately the political occasions of their time. Individuals are one of a kind in two regards: they have reason and the capacity to consider their activities. They speak with one another in the language they know. In contrast to different species, they can communicate their deepest musings and wants; they can share their thoughts and talk about what they consider to be acceptable and alluring. Political hypothesis has its foundations in these twin parts of the human self. It dissects certain essential inquiries, for example, how the general public ought to be sorted out, why government is required, what is the best type of government, what does the state owe its residents and what do we owe each other as residents (www.politics.as.nyu.edu). It looks at inquiries of this sort and efficiently manages the birthplaces, implications and essentialness of political thoughts that we know about, for example, opportunity, fairness, majority rule government, citizenship, equity, advancement, patriotism, secularism, and so forth. It explains the current meanings of these ideas by concentrating on some major political masterminds of the over a wide span of time. It likewise inspects the degree to which opportunity or uniformity are really present in the establishments that we partake in regular, for example, schools, shops, transports, trains, government workplaces, and so on. It sees in the case of existing definitions are satisfactory and how existing foundations of government and arrangement rehearses must be adjusted to turn out to be progressively popularity based in a methodical way. It tests the essentialness of standards, for example, rule of law, partition of forces, legal survey, and so forth. This is finished by inspecting the contentions progressed by various masterminds with regards to these ideas. Other than inspecting contentions, political schola rs additionally ponder the current political encounters and point out patterns and opportunities for what's to come. At the point when we start a discussion or contention on any theme, we as a rule ask what does it mean and how can it matter (www.politics.as.nyu.edu). End Political hypothesis implies speculating governmental issues. It urges individuals to look at their thoughts and emotions about political things. It opens them to orderly speculation on equity or correspondence so they can clean their suppositions and contend in an educated way and for regular interests. It examines and clarifies political thoughts and ideas as opposed to propel a specific convictions or translations like what political way of thinking does. In this specific situation, political hypothesis will mean a logical recommendation, a thought or set of thoughts that looks to clarify matters about legislative issues. Reference index Farrelly, C. (2003), An Introduction to Contemporary Political Theory, A Reader: Sage Publications Ltd, London. Heywood, A. (2004), Political Theory: An Introduction, third Edition: Palgrave MacMillan, New York. Hoffman, J. furthermore, Graham, P. (2009), Introduction to Political Theory, second Edition: Pearson Education Limited. (www.politics.as.nyu.edu), Chapter 1; Political Theory: An Introduction.pdf 1 Which means of Political Theory Which means of Political Theory The term Political Theory is made out of two words ‘Politics’ and ‘Theory’. Governmental issues implies the investigation of legislative issues whereby hypothesis is anything from an arrangement to a bit of conceptual information. In scholarly talk, be that as it may, a hypothesis is a logical suggestion, a thought or set of thoughts that somehow or another looks to force request or significance upon marvels. Political hypothesis includes investigative investigation of thoughts and precepts that have been integral to political idea (Heywood, 2004). This paper looks to examine the importance of political hypothesis. Political Philosophy Political Philosophy is worried about how the world should be instead of with how we see it now. In short this region of study is characterized dependent on what is experienced instead of on hypothesis. What political objectives, is it sensible and right to follow? The meanig of this is to be leally utilized to seek after such sensible and fundamental reason. In short these are the impotant questions Political Philosophy attempts to reply. Political logicians have examined them from times long past to late occasions, that is the reason the sound information on the historical backdrop of political idea isindispensable for political scholars. (Druwe ulrich) Political hypothesis is worried about moral or regularizing questions, for example, ‘Why should I comply with the state?’, ‘How prizes ought to be distributed?’ and ‘What ought to be the constraints of individual liberty?’ This conventional methodology is essentially keen on analyzing sees by incredible masterminds, legitimize them and discover their sources and the scholarly setting where they worked. Political hypothesis has endeavored to see better the conduct of entertainers like voters, lawmakers, lobbyists and officials, and has brought forth ‘rational choice,’ ‘public choice’ and ‘social choice’ ways of thinking. Heywood, 2004 Political hypothesis looks at inquiries of this sort and methodicallly explains the significance of ideas, for example,

5 Things Youre Forgetting to Ask During Your Review

5 Things You’re Forgetting to Ask During Your Review The basic purpose of a performance review is to provide feedback on your performance.However, the vast majority of such reviews finish within five minutes because most of the managers want to get over with it as soon as possible.As a matter of fact, most bosses feel at sea when it comes to reviewing someones performance.They normally do not have any plan to discuss your appraisal, nothing to talk about analyzing your strengths, weaknesses and future growth areas etc.You as an employee or subordinate obviously want to get a salary raise or possible promotion from your review.If you cannot attain both of these goals, you would at least try to get five-star ranking or wonderful reviews about your work.But, you have to face sheer disappointment on most occasions.About 90% of the managers would only show you your performance review form, saying you are doing a good job and that is it.Your review is over even before you have settled in your chair.It has happened to most of us in the past a nd will happen to some of us in the future.But, you need to keep in mind that a performance review is always a two-way conversation.For instance, you do not have to be a silent listener if your boss falls into the above-mentioned category.You can encourage a prolonged and fruitful discussion by asking some appropriate questions of your own.It is your opportunity to bond with your boss and expand your knowledge.Performance reviews are also the best time to share your suggestions and goals.Remember you are part of a team and you can only become a better professional by revealing what is working for you and what is not.More importantly, it will also enable your boss to become a better leader. There are employees who will never get a chance to sit with their boss and discuss their performance and show their commitment to the company.Therefore, never ever be a submissive participant during your performance review.Try to be more proactive and use this rare interaction with your manager to your maximum advantage.WHAT IS A PERFORMANCE REVIEW?In simple words, a performance review is a meeting between a manager and a team member where the earlier measures the efficiency and performance of the latter.The manager also assesses the employees effectiveness and subsequently, gives the appropriate feedback.The employee can use the feedback to improve his performance in the future.On most occasions, managers discuss other things like salary hike and possible promotion in the performance review as well.Also referred to as performance appraisal or check-ins, the performance review is your chance to improve your relationships with your boss or manager.Getting an honest feedback from the boss is also necessary because it often proves to be a decisive factor in making or breaking your corporate career. Establishing a good rapport with your boss means you will have a much easier time to perform your day to day duties.Similarly, the boss will most likely set lenient deadlines for you which you can meet in a fizzy.On the contrary, a shaky relationship with your boss means deadlines will be tighter for you. In addition, the work environment will be tense and stressful.Your immediate boss happens to be the most stressful person for you at your workplace.One way of reducing tension at work is to have good terms with your boss.Use your performance review to your advantage and try to develop a good relationship with your manager by asking some really thoughtful questions.5 QUESTIONS TO ASK DURING YOUR REVIEWIn the context of the above discussion, the following are the five questions you should always ask during your annual performance appraisal.What Are My Future Growth Areas?It always feels good when your boss praises you for your work.Admiration always works as a great ego booster. But, you are still not at your acme even if you have done nothing but performing absolutely brilliantly during the last year.There is always a room for improvement. It is your own duty t o identify your future growth areas and ask your boss, in your review, how to improve in those areas.Devoting some time to continuous professional development is also essential.If you want to grow professionally and move forward, you still have to learn and do a lot of new things.You need to ask your boss whether it should be in the form of taking a high-profile and difficult project, mastering a new technical skill or some sort of management training. Honestly speaking, most managers find it very difficult to identify growth areas for you.Things can get really tough for you if your boss has the tendency of giving critical feedback.You will struggle to perform according to his expectations in this particular case.He may only give a standard great job or similar feedback if you have done well in the period under discussion in the performance review, failing to think about any constructive advice which might help you in your future endeavors.In an ideal world, your boss should point o ut 2-3 areas you must focus on during the next 6-12 months.On the other hand, it is up to you to come up with your own growth areas in the review if your boss has not specified any.If your boss is in haste to finish the review, you can interrupt him and ask questions like, What are the next steps I should take for my career growth? or Do I need to learn new technical skills to assist my growth?Questions like these can turn your performance review on its head.They will compel the manager to change his strategy and think hard about your growth areas and performance.It also conveys the message to him that you take care of your career progression seriously.You can create a comprehensive list of growth areas also including the areas identified by the manager.Finally, never forget to take advice on how you can improve these areas and whether or not the organization will help you learn new skills.What Are the Goals You Want Me to attain?Bosses or managers set different goals for different employees depending upon their experience and skill set.The best time to make sure your boss clearly explains these goals to you is the performance review.It gives you a rare chance to have a long discussion with your boss and identify what are the goals he wants you to attain during the next year.After all, you cannot live up to your managers expectations if you do not have any idea what they are.Similarly, you should also prepare a list of goals you attained over the course of the last 12 months.It will enable you and your boss to reflect upon your achievements and failures and how you can rectify the mistakes which lead to those failures. It will help both of you to set realistic and specific, measurable, attainable and relevant goals for you.You and your boss should be in perfect harmony over what you want to accomplish in the next month, 3 months,   6 months and 12 months.Some employees also take the liberty of making a list of goals before going to the performance review.Subse quently, they ask their respective bosses to create their own list by adding or deleting goals from their list.Goal setting for the coming year can be really helpful as it enables you to prepare well in advance for the next performance review.Having clear goals in mind will help you set specific milestones and achievements against each goal, enabling you to improve your performance and negotiate a better package for yourself.You should not hesitate to ask how autonomous you are to attain each of these goals.Your manager probably trusts you a lot if he awards you a reasonable level of autonomy.Some of the questions you can ask about your goals during your performance review are, What you want me to accomplish by the next years performance review?Or, I want to ensure I set realistic and attainable goals for myself. How can you help me in this regard? Or What are some of the criteria you will assess my performance against in the future?It is pertinent to mention that most of the employ ees cannot articulate their own goals.They often do not have any idea what their boss or manager has in the bag for them.However, you must always have a full understanding of your boss’s priorities.As a result, you can give valuable assistance or information to your boss regarding setting your goals for the future, which will definitely improve your rankings during the next performance review.Timeline for Promotion or Salary RaiseAgainst common perception, your manager will not give you any salary raise, promotion or bonus after every performance review.He may only review your performance, pinpoint your weak areas, advice about how you can improve and set goals for the future.But, it is the best time to determine what is the timeline for your next promotion or raise.You can ask about what are the next steps you have to take to get there. One of the best methods to ensure your own growth is to show dedication and commitment to the company’s growth in the annual review.It is defin itely better to talk about your performance and goals at the start, but you can and should end by talking about the possible date or month you will get your much-deserved promotion or salary raise.Sometimes, your boss will not reveal the exact timeline you so desperately want to know despite your best efforts. In this case, you can allude to your intentions by employing different techniques.For example, you can start by mentioning that you are really happy with your current salary and position and the growth opportunities the organization provides you with.It conveys to the manager that you want to talk about your raise or promotion in a more constructive and positive way instead of locking horns with him.Exact wording you can use to accomplish this task can be something like, I really like my position in the company.I am also thankful to the administration for providing me with abundant growth opportunities.What I can do in addition to performing my current duties to get a salary r aise or possibly a promotion?Can you please give me a timeline when you think I can get there?Timeline for Next ReviewYour annual performance review is the most important tool when it comes to analyzing your performance in the year gone by.However, it is not enough to measure your performance accurately.There are many other things you need to do to ensure you get the proper appraisal of your skills and services you render to your organization.For example, you should find ways to have frequent meetings with your boss or manager.Most of these meetings should focus on your performance and whether or not you are on the right path to attain all of your goals.You can even request for an informal check-in 6 to 7 months before the actual review.It is imperative for you to learn how your boss perceives of you if you want to perform better in the next annual review. It will also give you a lot of time to work on the areas which your boss thinks you need to improve.The more friendly, informal conversation will help you identify some of the extra projects and responsibilities you can take in the middle of the year.Casual talks can also reveal the real intentions and feelings of your boss, enabling you to modify your strategy accordingly.Similarly, you can also reconfigure your priorities and goals to meet the ever-changing expectations of higher authorities. This will go a long way in enhancing your ranking during the actual review.The questions you can ask to determine the exact timeline for next formal check-in can be, What is the approximate date when you will call me for the next performance review? or Can we have an informal check-in session sooner because the next formal session seems to be too far away?You can also rephrase the question such as I would love you to have an immediate performance review session so I make sure that I am on the right track to attain all my goals for the year.Is there Anyone Else I should Get Feedback from?It is commonly and somewhat rig htly believed that only your manager will analyze your performance in the annual check-ins.However, you should also strive to get feedback from some other people during the peak of the review season.These people may include boss of your boss, your clients, managers of other teams, anyone you report to or even your colleagues. The best person to ask where you can get extra feedback is your own manager.You can kill two birds with one stone by asking for additional feedback.Firstly, it shows your relentless commitment to your organization.Secondly, it shows that you want to be an integral part of your team and you are not doing all this to simply impress your superiors.Best of all, you will have a more holistic idea of your performance and what others, especially people occupying managerial positions, think of you.These are the people you normally come in contact with on a daily basis.What you can do is to ask your reviewer to introduce you to people who can give feedback that really m atters.Furthermore, utilize your performance view to meet new people and expand your network.However, always take your reviewer or managers advice about whom to meet.Asking multiple people to review your performance and give suggestions about how you can improve is definitely important.However, you should focus most of your energies and efforts to attain goals and accomplish tasks specified for you by your immediate boss or manager.Strive hard to meet all the expectations of the person directly in charge of your success.The question you can ask to find more people for your performance review is, Who are other people I can meet and get valuable and practical feedback from.CONCLUSIONYes, the main reason why performance reviews are carried out is to analyze what you have been doing for the past 12 months.But, you must also utilize the annual check-ins to plan for your future success.You should leave no stone unturned to learn what you need to do in the next year.Maximize the advantages of performance reviews and identify areas you must improve and skills you need to learn to get to the next level.

How Did the Depression Affect France - 945 Words

The closing days of the 1920’s were a start of what would be the worst economic disaster that had ever been witnessed. The effect that the Great Depression had on capitalist countries such as Germany and the United States, was that their stocks and shares heavy economy plunged, leaving businesses unable to trade, and poverty throughout the nation. In the case of France, the depression initially did not suddenly bring the economy down drastically as it had to the more industrialised nations. Although relatively unscathed at first, by 1931 the ripple effect had hit France which steamrolled the economic downturn of the French economy. With France following the gold standard, the economic downturn lasted much longer than other affected†¦show more content†¦Following the events, Gaston Doumergue formed a government which had to endure criticism for not protecting against anti fascism, economic policies which were unflavoured by both left, and right wing institutions (McMil lan, 2003, p.58), which led to his government to focus on their communist policies, putting the peasants and rural workers as priority. His decision to take vigorous action against deflation, to better all members of society greatly setback by the depression to help aid social disorder was met with much discontent by many radicals (Jackson, 1988, p.45). The popular front led by Leon Blum, was the socialist government from 1936 which put in place the ‘Matignon Agreement’. Several developments established during the period of governing such as raising wages, and introducing the forty hour working week (James, 2003, p.124). Although they had in a sense united workers and employers, the adverse consequences resulted in a radicalised nation, with strong policing on tax evasion, and the reforms were substantially expensive (James, 2003, pp.124-125). Politically, the poor stability of the French economy didn’t allow Blum and his party to enforce their power across Europe. With the German economy recovering rapidly, and the vast military production, France simply didn’t have the resources to match up to the threat posed upon them (James, 2003, p.125). In conclusion, theShow MoreRelatedThe Great Depression1368 Words   |  6 PagesAfter WW1 the Great Depression had a very late impact on the major film companies in France, when it did, it unfortunately caused several film studios to go bankrupt, then in the late 1920’s to 1930’s many small film companies and groups emerged giving birth to the tendency called poetic realism. Because the large companies who made films with a focus on making money were gone the filmmakers and artists were able to concern themselves with the art of film, they often took poetic innovations thatRead MoreThe Global Effects of Imperialism, World War I and the Great Depression1424 Words   |  6 PagesThe Global Effects of Imperialism, World War I and the Great Depression Bentley first talked about cross-cultural interactions as a way to categorize the World’s history. He in addition wrote aboutRead MoreEvents Between 1870-19451419 Words   |  6 Pagesfinding out ways to take a step back and look at actions as they affect multiple nations simultaneously. Of these international events from 1870-1945, the Age of Imperialism, World War I, and the Great Depression had worldwide impacts on economic and social issues. Imperialism in the late 19th century became a competition among European countries to take control of as many areas in Africa before the others did. For the most part, France, England, and Germany competed for bragging rights to these countriesRead MoreWorld War II And Its Impact On The World1593 Words   |  7 PagesWhat first comes to mind when you hear about World War II? Is it how it greatly affected different societies or how scary it is to think that a terrorist like Hitler gained so much power over so many countries? Well, the real question that we should be really thinking and learning about is what is World War II about? In general, World War II was a war that involved many countries that started after the First World War. It started in 1939 and ended during 1945. It was a very important war to allRead MoreFrances Perkins and the Great Depression1724 Words   |  7 PagesTo what extent is Frances Perkins responsible for and involved in the economic and social policies dur ing The Great Depression? Frances Perkins role in government through pre and post great depression is not as widely recognized as some her fellow cabinet members who also pushed the New Deal. The details of who was the driving force behind the New Deal have been skewed over the years. How did Frances Perkins influence the economic and social policies of the Great Depression? Do people only rememberRead MoreThe War Of The Great War1520 Words   |  7 Pagesthe case. It was a new type of a war, there were new, terrifying weapons, leading to deaths in numbers unseen from previous wars. The battles dragged on, it became trench warfare. There seemed to be no end in sight for the longest time. But the war did end and the people and politicians of the 1920s were left to deal with the aftermath. Most of the men that went to war went home from the front lines, others were not as lucky, or possibly, they were luckier to have died a noble death considering whatRead MoreEssay on The Conseq uences of the Failure of the League in the 1930s1280 Words   |  6 Pages of leading members, economic sanctions did not work, America and other important countries were absent, the league had to cope with a lack of troops, the treaties it had to uphold were seen as unfair and also, the decisions that the league made were slow. The first major test for the League came when the Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931. Japan, like many other countries around the world, was suffering due to the Depression caused by the Wall Street Crash in AmericaRead MoreEssay on The Great Depression1003 Words   |  5 Pages1929-1942 America at its lowest. How did such a catastrophe arise? Who did it affect? What was the outcome of this horrid era? The Great Depression is known for its downfalls, such as agricultural scarcity, poor banking, and the ignorance of man. Contrary to popular belief, its cause is not the crash of the stock market, but rather a number of interrelated factors. This downfall left people on the streets with harsh working conditions, and nature was not on America’s side especially with the DustRead MoreThe Greatest Single Cause Of The War Essay1741 Words   |  7 Pages‘The greatest single cause of the war was the system of secret alliances which developed.’ How far do you agree with this interpretation on what caused World War One. The first world war between the triple entente and the triple alliance is said to be the first modern war. A previously unseen number of human lives were lost on both sides and because of this when the war ended it came to be known as ‘the war to end all wars’ — as said by the former president of the United States Woodrow Wilson.Read MoreThe Great Recession Essay1692 Words   |  7 PagesGeorge Santayana, a Spanish poet and philosopher said, Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it. This quote applies to the Great Depression of 1929 and the Great Recession of 2008. There are many similarities between the two, like the causes, the actual events, and the aftermaths. Several factors led to the Great Depression, which were the following: overproduction by business and agriculture, unequal distribution of wealth, Americans buying less, and finally, the stock market crash

Providing Diabetes Care in General Practice Free Essay Example, 2000 words

In diabetes primary care the first and one of the most important stages is identifying people with diabetes. According to the estimates, about 80 percent of those, who are diagnosed with diabetes, are able to be taught and to be managed within the limits of the primary care, though the potential patients with Diabetes Type 2 are really diagnosed, as they may live for years without any evident symptoms of the disease, that is why all specialists in all spheres of medicine must always be alert in relation to possible discovery of diabetes among their patients through other symptoms, which at first seem to have no connection with diabetes itself. In order to increase the effectiveness of diabetes management in primary care it is necessary to undertake the following steps: It is necessary to check all pregnant women on the subject of diabetes; People, who have at least one possible symptom of diabetes, should be carefully investigated for the possible confirmation of diagnosis; Taking i nto account that the rates of diabetes among older people are higher than those among the younger, and that the rates of disease are higher among African, Caribbean and Asian races, with those who have hereditary cases in no relation to race or age, should be subjected to special control for discovering the correct diagnosis in time. We will write a custom essay sample on Providing Diabetes Care in General Practice or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now New criteria for diagnosis and definition of diabetes of both types have been recently announced by the World Health Organization. According to the new definitions and criteria, the indices of glucose have been lowered to 7.0 mmol/l, thus at present diabetes will be diagnosed at the bigger amount of patients, though this will allow more through management and control of diabetes in primary care. These indices are used for the patients, who have no visual symptoms and the analysis should be repeated several times during several days. For the patients without any diabetes symptoms, the analysis and diagnosis are usually based on glucose determination only. (Standards of clinical care for people with diabetes, 1994)It is important to note the changes in the blood and plasma glucose levels, and in diabetes, primary care patients usually have their blood glucose measured with the help of glucose meter. After the diagnosis has been confirmed and primary procedures and analyses have been performed, it is necessary to carry out the initial diagnostic assessment. It happens sometimes, that the patient under investigation may feel unwell and thus will need hospitalization, or insulin therapy.

How do poets use ‘voice’ to instil their poems with personality Consider with reference to three poets Free Essays

For poetry to be truly personal, a voice is needed. It is through the voice of a poet that the reader can glean some sense of that poet’s identity and nature. Who are they? What are they trying to say? Why? One could even go so far as to say that the voice of a poem or poet is fundamental to its aesthetic value and ‘readability’ – without a distinct and clear voice, how can we distinguish a poem from the surrounding, ambient babble? It is the voice which endears a poet to the reader – without a voice, how can we identify with a poet? All these questions must be considered carefully. We will write a custom essay sample on How do poets use ‘voice’ to instil their poems with personality? Consider with reference to three poets or any similar topic only for you Order Now The voice of a poet can be a vehicle for political, personal, and social expression, as well as instilling a poem with a sense of personality – one might say the function of a poet’s ‘voice’ is to stamp their poem with their identity. It is the idea of an author’s voice, rather than the voice itself which draws us towards the author as an entity – someone with whom we can identify, converse and understand. The actual process of reading may be, on one level, entirely one-sided, but in reading a poem (or any piece of literature for that matter) we bring as much to the work as we take from it. In this way, reading a poem is not one-sided at all, and is instead a rich progression towards a higher understanding from the reader. In the end, it comes down to the age-old question: do words on a page in a closed book actually mean anything until they are read, and even when they are, is it possible to be both ‘voiceless’ and meaningful? It has been argued in Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory (Bennett Royle, 1999) that every literary text has a voice, be it that of an omnipotent and omniscient ‘god-like’ authorial voice, or a character of the author’s creation. According to this theory, even the Biology textbook – that most mundane and impersonal of publications – is infused with the voice(s) of its author(s). As Roland Barthes points out in his landmark essay â€Å"The Death of the Author† (Image, Music, Text, 1977), this is the sole reason why authors put their name on a piece of work. An author will lend their name to their novel/poem in order to distinguish it from other novels/poems. Ultimately, however, Barthes argues that this is meaningless: an author is nothing more than a product of his or her society and background, and therefore, the author cannot claim some sort of absolute authority over his or her text because, in some ways, he or she did not wri te it. In other words, it is writing that makes the author and not vice versa. There are, however, flaws in Barthes’ argument, which will be analysed further on. It is important at this stage, however, to make a clear distinction between the ‘author’ and the ‘voice’ in order to avoid any confusion that may arise. In many ways, the ‘author’ and the ‘voice’ of a poem or any work of fiction are intrinsically linked: the author is the voice and the voice is the author, in much the same way that Sylvia Plath is the voice in her poems or her work of fiction, The Bell Jar. There is no getting around the fact that we ‘hear’ Jean-Paul Sartre’s voice in The Age of Reason and Nausea, or Fontane’s voice in Effi Briest. The same can be said of the poets I have chosen: Linton Kwesi Johnson’s voice is clear and distinct, as are those of Tom Leonard and Sylvia Plath. In this way, one might say, the author or poet and their voice are one and the same – indistinguishable from each other. In other ways, though, it is easy to trip up and become muddled in the literary thorn bush that blocks our path whenever we try to make a generalisation. A novel like Anthony Burgess’ A Clockwork Orange (1962) displays no apparent sign of the author’s ‘voice’ – indeed it is written in a language entirely of his own creation (NadSat – the disjointed, disorderly jargon of a future jilted generation) and through the voice of the novel’s protagonist, ‘Alex’. Obvious questions arise. Whose ‘voice’ is Burgess speaking with? His own or Alex’s? Can they be both? Of course, Alex is a creation of Burgess’ mind and therefore the voice is ultimately that of Burgess himself – he thought of the character, put pen to paper, and put words in Alex’s mouth. But how far does this go? To what extent is Alex his own entity, free to evolve and grow within the limits and boundaries imposed by his author? H ow far and to what extent is Alex simply a mouthpiece for Burgess’ ‘voice’: moralising and ominous. In the end, we are never really sure whether Alex has been ‘cured’ or not, or (which is more interesting) whether the author even knows. The same theme is explored in Flann O’Brien’s novel, At Swim-Two-Birds (1939), in which issues of ‘author’, ‘voice’, and even the idea of a character, are thrown into question. But how does this relate to poetry and the issue of ‘voice’? To start with, the same problems of discerning the ‘voice’ from the ‘author’ are present, but much more subtle, in the poets I have chosen. I have deliberately picked poets who ‘speak’ in their own ‘voice’ as it were, in an attempt to highlight the different motives with which ‘voice’ is used. For example, in Sylvia Plath’s poems, ‘voice’ is used to express deep and intimate emotional feelings, and in some cases, psychological trauma as in her moving poem â€Å"Daddy†. In this poem, Plath’s voice is clearly enunciated, and the effect of this is to give the reader a powerful insight into the workings of the poet’s mind. The poem deals with Plath’s relationship with her dead father, and how she must reconcile his past and her roots in a post-war world. As the poem progresses, however, the reader comes to realise that ‘Daddy’ is not the bà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½te noir we suppose him to be – and instead we understand that he is an integral part of Plath as a person. A part she has come to hate and associate with her father. A part she can never escape: â€Å"Daddy, daddy, you bastard, I’m through.† (80) Plath’s voice comes through in a number of cunning ways here. It seems as though she is addressing her father, and therefore speaks in the first person singular for example: â€Å"I used to pray to recover you.† (14) As a result, the poem seems all the more intense and personal – perhaps because we are listening in on a one-sided conversation which we feel we should not be listening to. The effect is akin to reading someone’s personal letter, when feelings of guilt compete with an innate curiosity about other people’s intimate details. In this way, her anguish is eloquently expressed in the first stanza: You do not do, you do not do Any more, black shoe In which I have lived like a foot For thirty years, poor and white, Barely daring to breathe or Achoo. 5 (1-5) But we could also make a case that the â€Å"Daddy† in the poem is not only her father (and perhaps a part of herself), but her husband, Ted Hughes, as well. For example, towards the end of the poem, various subtle references to marriage are made: â€Å"And I said I do, I do.† (67) The idea of two men (the two men in Plath’s life) is brought up again when we are told that â€Å"If I’ve killed one man, I’ve killed two†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (71), and a direct reference to the poet’s marriage is made at line 72: â€Å"The vampire who said he was you/And drank my blood for a year,/Seven years if you want to know† (72-74). It is almost as though Plath is being suffocated by the omniscient and omnipotent men who surround her – both alive and dead. We can only understand this because Plath has instilled her poem with her own ‘voice’ – had the poem been written in an impersonal, detached way, completely devoid of any discer nible ‘voice’, the intensely personal sense we get of Plath being smothered would be lost. But the strong and clear voice that comes through also raises issues about Plath’s identity: who she feels she is and is not. She says at one point that she thinks she â€Å"may well be a Jew† (35), when in fact she is not. This is echoed by her despondent, resonant cry in a foreign language: â€Å"Ich, ich, ich, ich.† (27) It is clear that the poem has a strong personality, and this personality is only made possible with the presence of Plath’s voice. A link can be made here to another of Plath’s poems, â€Å"The Bee Meeting†, which also raises the question of identity. Unlike â€Å"Daddy†, this poem is not addressed or aimed at anyone in particular, but this does not mean that it is any less personal, and it still retains Plath’s ‘voice’ as she is again speaking in the first person. The poem reinforces the poet’s sense of abject loneliness in a world populated by well-to-do figures of society who (it seems) neither really care for, nor understand her. In â€Å"The Bee Meeting†, Plath joins various members of the parish to collect honey from the â€Å"white hive†(34). When the other figures don their veils and heavy outer garments for protection, however, their identities are lost, and this frightens Plath, who does not want to be lost in turn: Is it some operation that is taking place? 30 It is the surgeon my neighbours are waiting for, This apparition in a green helmet, Shining gloves and white suit. Is it the butcher, the grocer, the postman, someone I know? 35 (30-35) Plath’s voice comes across most strongly, however, when she tells us of her fear and her nakedness while all others are clothed. We are told that she is â€Å"nude as a chicken neck, does nobody love me?† (6) and â€Å"Now I am milkweed silk, the bees will not notice./They will not smell my fear, my fear, my fear.† (9-10) Clearly, a tortured, lonely, forlorn voice is at work here, appealing vainly for understanding in the hopelessly detached way that abject melancholia brings. Her tired, sad, frail voice is heard at the end: â€Å"Whose is that long white box in the grove, what have they accomplished, why am I cold.† (55) The lack of a question mark at the end implies that an answer is not expected, perhaps because Plath knows that she will never receive one. The subtlety in the image of the coffin-like â€Å"long white box† hints at hidden depths to Plath’s feelings – depths which are both limitless and moving. We could go so far as to say that Plath associates and identifies herself with the hive and its angry bees: confused, chaotic, and directionless. By putting the bees to sleep, the hive, â€Å"as snug as a virgin† (34), is violated. In the same way perhaps, Plath sees herself as violated or raped by the world around her. Once again, it is only through her powerful voice that we understand these emotions. Problems of identity are strongly linked in both poems (the â€Å"Ich, ich, ich,† of â€Å"Daddy† and images of lost identity in â€Å"The Bee Hive Meeting†), and this question surfaces again in the poems of Linton Kwesi Johnson. In a poem like â€Å"Mekkin Histri†, Johnson’s voice is immediately clear and challenging: â€Å"now tell mi something/mistah govahment man/tell mi something.† (1-3) Johnson’s voice searches, accuses, demands: how lang yu really feel yu coulda keep wi andah heel 5 wen di trute done reveal bout how yu grab an steal bout how yu mek yu crooked deal mek yu crooked deal? ` (4-9) It is clear that the voice coming through here is a purely political one, and the colloquial language that Johnson employs reinforces his poems’ sense of ‘otherness’ and originality. The language is both alien and familiar, both intimidating and soothing. But it is also a collective voice – a voice of the people, but not all the people. It is a voice demanding complete and radical change, an alien voice that has become disillusioned with the society that surrounds it. The title of the poem, â€Å"Mekkin Histri† implies a time of great change, and this is exactly what Johnson was doing at a time when the British establishment was threatening to revert back to an entirely conservative, jingoistic and exclusive mindset. It is not surprising that Linton Kwesi Johnson has earned himself the nickname of ‘The Prophet’, who, with his eclectic mix of dub beats and chanting poetry, captured the political heart and soul of Britain’s black yo uth in the 1980s, and, many say, continues to do so today. It is perhaps due to the African tradition for collective storytelling and music that Johnson’s voice is so much more powerful and raw compared to other poets/songwriters talking about the same thing, for example Gil Scott-Heron. Perhaps it also has something to do with the way the poems are written and their apparent inaccessibility to the ‘Western’ reader. What it succeeds in doing is creating, once read aloud, a true sense of Johnson’s voice – its rhythm and patterns, recreated in our own, individual voices. These are poems that cannot be read silently: they make no sense just as words on a page. For them to be truly understood, these words, seemingly unfamiliar at first, become familiar once we voice them ourselves. In a way, Johnson is raising the whole concept of ‘voice’ in poetry to another level – ‘voice’ is no longer something we get a sense of when reading words on a page; it is something we must enunciate f or ourselves. When it becomes collective poetry (Johnson’s words through everybody else’s voice), it speaks for everyone, regardless of his or her colour. We cannot help but identify with the poet and his words because, essentially, they become our own. This sense of a collective poetry, of Johnson speaking for everyone, comes across strongly in all of his poems, and â€Å"BG† (his tribute to Bernie Grant, the first black Member of Parliament) is no exception to this rule: yu woz wi cheef yu woz wi choice yu woz wi champian yu woz wi face yu woz wi voice 20 yu woz wi main man (16-21) But if Linton Kwesi Johnson is using ‘voice’ in his poetry to achieve a political end, then Tom Leonard is using his voice to represent a social one. Like Johnson, Leonard writes in the strong dialect he speaks, hailing from Glasgow. Like Johnson and Plath, his poems are infused with his own voice, and, by writing in his colloquial way, forces the reader to read the words aloud, or imagine how they would sound spoken. Thus, what seems to be an incomprehensible passage can be understood when read aloud in a broad Scottish accent: ifyi stull huvny wurkt oot 35 thi diff- rince tween yir eyes n yir ears; 40 – geez peace, pal! (From â€Å"Unrelated Incidents† 33-42) Not only does Leonard’s voice come through very strongly here, the form of this particular poem (â€Å"Unrelated Incidents†) adds to the overall effect Leonard is trying to achieve – namely by breaking up the flow of the writing, the reader is forced to ponder over and analyse individual words and phrases at a time. It seems also that Leonard is concerned with the subjectivity of language, and the way different words and different intonations mean different things to different people. It has been said that language is a slippery medium, and this is all too true in the cultural divide between England and Scotland. Although on paper both countries speak the same language, in reality, the different ways in which English is used by both the Scots and English themselves, suggests that this is not the case. Leonard points out the root of these differences in â€Å"Unrelated Incidents†, in an excerpt called â€Å"The 6 O’clock News†: thirza right way ti spell ana right way 90 to tok it. This is me tokn yir right way a spellin. this is ma trooth. 95 (â€Å"The 6 O’clock News† 88-95) Leonard seems to be highlighting here the discrepancy between ‘tokking’ (or talking) and spelling. There may be a ‘right’ way of spelling, says Leonard, but there is no ‘right’ way of talking (not in these days when ‘received pronunciation’ is an institution which is frowned upon and laughed at, anyway). Your right way of talking is not my right way of talking. Similarly, Leonard says, your right way of spelling is no longer my right way of spelling. â€Å"this/is ma trooth† (94-95). We see this most clearly in his poem â€Å"In the Beginning was the Word†, in which spelling and language is slowly corrupted and deconstructed, leaving in its place something new and startlingly clear: . in the beginning was the word . in thi beginning was thi wurd in thi beginnin was thi wurd in thi biginnin was thi wurd in thi biginnin wuz thi wurd 5 n thi biginnin wuz thi wurd nthi biginnin wuzthi wurd nthibiginin wuzthiwurd nthibiginninwuzthiwurd . in the beginning was the sound . 10 We can see, then, that these poets are all linked in the way they use their ‘voice’: Sylvia Plath uses hers to instil her poems with a sense of her own personality and intimacy; Linton Kwesi Johnson uses his to use our voice, in effect, in order to put a political point across; and Tom Leonard uses his to illustrate the subjective nature of language, and how we use it to achieve our own ends. In this way, we can see how these poets have all used their ‘voice’ in different ways – all to create the effect that it is their poetry and no-one else’s. These poets are distinct in their original and compelling use of their own individual ‘voices’. Earlier in this essay, I mentioned Roland Barthes’ piece, â€Å"The Death of the Author†, and it seems appropriate here, now that I have highlighted the ways in which these poets operate concerning ‘voice’, to analyse his essay in this context. Barthes holds that an author or poet cannot be individual or original because he or she is merely a product of the society that surrounds them. This throws the whole concept of the ‘author function’ into question: is an author really an author? Have they really written what they have written? I believe that the use of ‘voice’ in poetry proves that a poet or an author can be individual and original. It is true that a poet like Tom Leonard or Linton Kwesi Johnson writes in the dialect of his society, and is therefore (to an extent) a product of that society, but this does not address the fact that these poets are entities in themselves, bringing something original to their work, and they are not simply blank sheets which society has filled in. In short, these poets do not regurgitate their society: they regurgitate themselves. Every poet brings something new and original to the world of poetry and literature, and if this were not the case, then poetry and literature would never have advanced at all. Wordsworth said that a poet is someone who is â€Å"pleased with his own passions and volitions, and who rejoices more than other men in the spirit of life that is in him; delighting to contemplate similar volitions and passions as manifested in the goings-on of the Universe, and habitually impelled to create them where he does not find them,† (â€Å"Preface to Lyrical Ballads†, 1798) and to this I would only add that today, a great poet should have a strong voice. The voice of a poet is his true identity – that which he is judged against, and that which compares him to all others. Ultimately, a poet’s voice is his defining feature: an existential monument to who he is – something entirely unique, and something that should be cherished. How to cite How do poets use ‘voice’ to instil their poems with personality? Consider with reference to three poets, Papers

Not Just A Job free essay sample

In ninth grade I participated in a local breast cancer walk which broadened my mind regarding how many people were affected by the horrific disease of cancer. I desire to learn more information on cancer research, as well as additional health science research, so I can expand the minds of other people. Throughout my years of high school I’ve become more and more interested in the physical well being of others. Exercise and healthy habits is one area I feel Americans need more education. I want to make a difference in the world in this area. Too many people are not taking care of themselves and are possibly dying younger than they should. I’m very open-minded about what health science program I would like to major in. I have a particular interest in physical therapy because there is a considerable amount of new patients with different problems to assist. We will write a custom essay sample on Not Just A Job or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page I learned this through shadowing at Dr. Barry Moochler at his private practice. People came from all walks of life: the young and the old, injuries from sports or automobile accidents. Throughout my life I’ve taken care of my body by eating healthy and staying active. Over a period of ten years, gymnastics and cheerleading played a major role in helping me to stay fit and to live a healthy lifestyle. I know how important it is to take care of my body and I want to help other people take care of theirs as well. Taking care of injuries and preventing injuries is one area where I feel I could make a difference. Whether injuries come from playing sports or something as simple as poor posture, I’m looking forward to being taught how to make the lifestyles of others healthier. The field of health sciences caught my eye because it is a topic of continuous change. There are many areas of this field that require constant learning which is precisely what intrigues me. I enjoy th e constant variation of knowledge which keeps me fascinated. I don’t want just any job for the rest of my life. I’m looking forward to becoming a specialist in my field of study; not just someone who applies old knowledge to help people but one who is willing to learn more to help people in a better way.